Many years ago, when I was taking Survey of American Literature as an
undergraduate, Dr. Howard Creed, our instructor, mentioned that Sherwood
Anderson was quite arguably the most influential minor writer in the history of
American literature. Anderson wrote Winesburg,
Ohio, a novel that was the first book written by an American which could
not have been written at all if the author had not read Freud and, for better
or worse, been so powerfully influenced by Freud that it could be truthfully
said that, without Freud, the author would never have written that particular
book.
Anderson's novel sold well and was much
better than most novels that were selling well at the time. It was especially
popular with and widely discussed among those younger readers who fancied
themselves "literary" and day-dreamed about novels they might write
themselves someday. Winesburg, Ohio is not remembered today as a
great book or remembered at all very often. But, it was an influential book in
its time. Specifically, Its influence made Freud more important to American
writers by showing how psychoanalytic concepts could be used to develop complex
characters and plots that unfolded to reveal those complexities. Anderson also wrote six different
autobiographies. All were well written and seemed plausible as revelations of Anderson's character. But, each
contradicted the other five in key ways that went far beyond just getting some
of the details wrong. The six books each candidly revealed the values and needs
of a different personality and explained how exactly that personality was
shaped by a lifetime of experience, Sherwood Anderson's lifetime of experience.
What does any of this have to do
with how exactly my personality was shaped by a lifetime of experience, not
Sherwood Anderson's but my own? This was the question being asked here and I'm
fairly sure that you, gentle reader, wish ardently that I would cut the
"literary" posturing and answer it. I can sympathize with Anderson and his several mutually
exclusive autobiographies. I cannot help but be aware that my past as I
remember and retell it is a revisionist history explaining how I came to be the
person I think I am as I sit here trying to get something written that will
accurately reflect this writer's sensibility and point of view. Episodes will
be recounted that I think will do so and those which do not will not come to
mind. The result will be a brief character sketch that will have coherency,
closure and ring true as a real story about me, but only because of everything
that was left out. There is no one true history that reveals the character of
the person who lived it. Any number of life-stories can be told about any one
person, all of them true but none of them capturing the whole truth all at once
in one story.
I was born in rural Alabama to a farmer and his wife. I was
their first and only child. They divorced when I was four and the court awarded
custody to my mom. This was pure sexism. Any woman who had not sacrificed an
elder infant to Bal would have gotten custody. I remember standing by the fire
with my dad in the mornings while I watched Captain Kangaroo and my dad
complained about Mr. Green-jeans. Mr. Green-jeans was supposed to be a farmer
but was nothing like my dad or any other farmer I or my dad had ever met. My
dad thought it was wrong to lie to kids like that.
Divorce was rare in this time and
place. I was the only child from a "broken home" in my first few
grades of school. Now, about the same percentage of children in that school
come from 'broken homes" as you would find in any other grade school. I can't recall any episode that would neatly
sum up the difference this made at the time but I cannot believe it made no
difference at all at a time when Stand by
your man and D-i-v-o-r-c-e were
two big hits, both by Tammy Wynette, that were played endlessly on the radio. I
feel it must have made a difference so I tell you a story about Tammy Wynette
to fill a hole in my story where a recalled episode should sit providing the
perfect example illustrating the difference it made.
I am the product of one of those
segregation academies that sprung up like mushrooms after a summer rain the
year after the Alabama schools finally desegregated. I
was embarrassed to be there at the time but, looking back, I think I was
probably better off there. Academic standards were about the same at both
schools and not terribly high at either. My grandfather was on the academy
governing board. His grandfather, James Monroe Roberts, was blinded fighting
for the Confederacy at the battle of Atlanta. Another ancestor, Richard
Roberts, fought in the revolutionary war. One fought to be an American and the
other fought not to be. My great-grandfather, Carlos Roberts, was a school
superintendent who believed in flying saucers. He was a break in the chain. My
grandfather often mentioned to me that I reminded him of his father in so many
ways that it was a bit spooky. The academy gave me more of what I needed to be
another break in the chain than a desegregated public school could have. The
academy did not reproduce the all-white public school that no longer existed.
It produced a parody of that situation that magnified and exaggerated all of
the more negative aspects of the culture that resisted desegregation so
stubbornly, of my culture of origin. I felt more out of place there than I ever
felt in the public schools either before or after desegregation. This made me
look around and notice that no one I wanted to be in 20 years time was a part
of that culture. This gap between where I came from and where I wanted to be
was more obvious to me because I attended the academy.
Very early on, I found that reading
books gave me a satisfying sense of knowing what was going on and why that I
never got from participating in the way of life I had been born to. I used
resources found in books to understand my self and my world much more than any
of my peers. I learned early to walk between worlds and still do. One world is
the world where my own life unfolds and the other is the world of books. Should
I mention discovering the novel Steppenwolf
at age 14 as an important event in
my life? Naturally, I wanted to be a writer when and if I ever managed to grow
up. I also wanted to know the meaning of life and to understand why the rest of
humanity did the things that humanity has been doing for thousands of years
now. Once I figured all this out, I was going to get rich and famous by writing
it all down in a book with a boy meets girl sub-plot and maybe a car chase or
two thrown in just to make the movie rights more rewarding. This work is still
in progress.
In the meantime, I've earned degrees
in philosophy, English, educational psychology, instructional technology and
won the Betty Crocker Future Homemaker of America award. I am now working on an
MA in Interdisciplinary Studies with ESL and plain old psychology as my
two majors. I am doing the psychology major just to find out what had to be
left out of my degree in educational psychology to make room for all those
courses I took in research design, statistics, qualitative methods and testing
theory that were not taught in the psychology program. Once I am done, I can
die happy knowing that I did not cheat myself out of anything by graduating
from an education school rather than a psychology department. I will,
unfortunately, be too old to do much of anything with that vast body of
knowledge but, then again, my quest for knowledge was always more about pure,
damnable curiosity than about the desire to learn to actually do anything in
particular. I've taught or tutored psychology, English, research methods and a
few other subjects over the years. I am mostly a distance educator now but
still occasionally teach or tutor on-ground. I am serious enough about animal
rights to be vegan. I play several drums and a few different stringed
instruments for fun. Kristoff, my cat, is curled up asleep on my desk as he
usually is when I am trying to get some work done.
I'm watching this text appear on a
sixty inch screen. I am not legally blind but I am blind enough that I was able
to write the screen off on my taxes as an adaptive required for work. I grade a
lot of essays and do get headaches when I work with a smaller monitor. I also
watch a lot of subtitled movies. I am not married and have no children. I live
with three other adults in what will eventually become a naturally occurring
retirement community for old hippies if we really have come to final rest here.
From the beginning, I have been
fascinated by words. Over the years, my emphasis has shifted from literature
and creative writing to teaching English as a second language. Doing a degree
in ESL so that I theoretically know what
I am doing has been a wonderful excuse to learn more about linguistics and to
think and write about language, how it is acquired, how it is used and how one
can best facilitate the acquisition of a second language. I say
"theoretically" know what I am doing because I, more and more, see
language as a kind of magic we learn how to do as we grow up without ever learning
how the magic actually works.